🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.